Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 24th Apr 2009 22:20 UTC
Permalink for comment 360665
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-12
It's easier for people to be emotional about these things than reasonable.
----------------
$17k is pretty cheap. We paid $20k for each of our Barco flat screens. 17 of them. Just the screens.
You can tell someone hasn't worked in the real world when they think $17k is a lot of money for an IT expenditure. That's a lot for someone sitting at home on a $1k Dell using free or cracked software to develop cheap, buggy knock offs of someone else's program.
I have a fairly "Protestant view" of fiscal responsibility and believe every penny should be accounted for. But it's not my responsibility to judge how another company uses theirs.
If they make frivolous expenditures frequently, they'll pay sooner or later. If they view it as a future tech testbed, then that's pretty darn cheap as tech investments go. And a write off.