Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 27th Apr 2009 15:07 UTC
Permalink for comment 360681
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-05-12
Apple suggested only that for many of the netbook use cases the iPhone is comparable (or even superior, e.g. it's always connected while most netbooks are not). They are not claiming that the iPhone can replace a netbook for everything.
They "felt the need" to do it because they are being constantly asked about the netbook market and about their plans regarding it - both directly on earning calls, etc., and indirectly in the press.
Probably not all criticisms are valid, at the very least not valid for all makes and models, but many are. The reason why they are generally overlooked, which is the same as one of the reasons why the "fad" hasn't died out yet, is that netbooks are dirt cheap. One simply can afford to buy one just to play around with or only use occasionally.
And as for netbooks still being a hot topic - the netbook product category is quite young, there are still some exciting developments and that's fueling the interest.
Apple are pointing out what's great about their products and comparing them to the competition. It seems to have worked handsomely for them, so let's refrain from giving Apple business advices.