Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 27th Apr 2009 15:07 UTC
Editorial Last week, Apple again repeated its claim that the iPhone and iPod Touch are capable of filling the netbook niche. They also claimed that netbooks can barely be called personal computers. Both of these statements are complete and utter nonsense, but instead of writing down some high-level definition of what a netbook is, I decided to simply write down all the things I do with my netbook that the iPhone/iPod Touch cannot do to make the difference between the two that much more tangible.
Permalink for comment 360762
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Thom is still wrong.
by NathanHill on Tue 28th Apr 2009 00:19 UTC in reply to "RE: Thom is still wrong."
Member since:

See my post above.

Netbooks are being trumped and defined by what they do, more than what their form factor is. Thus, we have many different netbook sizes. Pretty soon, 12" laptops are going to be called netbooks. I am just hoping they actually end up doing something different or providing a unique user experience over a laptop.

Because I think they can. At least, that is the netbook I am waiting on.

In the meanwhile, I have my iPod Touch as a great little netbook - it does have an irregular sort of form factor, but darn it, it does what a netbook needs to do.

No jealousy here. A satisfied customer on one hand... and a hopeful customer on the other.

Reply Parent Score: 1