Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 30th Apr 2009 22:09 UTC
Permalink for comment 361208
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-07-24
Er, no, actually. A Mac is a generic PC in a different case with a different operating system. It's the cost of developing the OS whilst maintaining compatibility with a rapidly changing ecosystem of hardware, software and peripherals that's the real issue.
And don't forget third party apps - without a large market footprint, there's no incentive to develop for OS X: a premium product with limited software compatibility isn't exactly premium. Anyone up for a bit of Mac gaming? Thought not...
That's why I smell trouble ahead for Macs. In the boom years, Apple basked in the glory of its media player products, raked in a few aspirationally hip converts to its PCs and converted this into mass market growth. It then moved up market and culled its low-end products - compare the price of the aluminium bodied Macs to the previous generation - but the recession is now cutting the legs from under its business model. That's why Apple is losing market share.