Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 9th May 2009 09:58 UTC
Since it's weekend, which usually equates to no news, we figured we'd follow in Engadget's footsteps by asking you, our dear and loving readers, what you would change about Apple's current Mac Pro. Engadget readers already had a few things to say - this is the internet after all. And since this is OSNews, we add a question of our own: what would you change about Mac OS X?
Permalink for comment 362686
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
First, Apple's choices are too limited for my tastes. I either get a Mac Pro, iMac, or a Mac Mini. What I would like to have is a non-Xeon tower that I can use the monitor of my choice and swap components at will. Besides, those laptop components used in the iMac are more expensive than off the shelf components that are standardized. I want quality, but I don't need Xeon, nor do I want limitations placed on me. Basically, I want what would be a pretty nice gaming rig on the PC, but as a Mac.
Second, what's with Apple's graphics card choices? They're rather lame. Do they not understand that many Mac users also want to play games in Windows? Crysis is extremely demanding...
Member since:
2006-03-21
First, Apple's choices are too limited for my tastes. I either get a Mac Pro, iMac, or a Mac Mini. What I would like to have is a non-Xeon tower that I can use the monitor of my choice and swap components at will. Besides, those laptop components used in the iMac are more expensive than off the shelf components that are standardized. I want quality, but I don't need Xeon, nor do I want limitations placed on me. Basically, I want what would be a pretty nice gaming rig on the PC, but as a Mac.
Second, what's with Apple's graphics card choices? They're rather lame. Do they not understand that many Mac users also want to play games in Windows? Crysis is extremely demanding...