Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 11th May 2009 08:46 UTC
Permalink for comment 362955
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-05-05
Intel may have been the one offereing perks to the OEM's to use their chips, but ultimatly the OEM's chose to take those bribes. Am I wrong in assuming that the OEM's too are guilty to an extent?
It isn't just about offering the perks. If the OEM vendors used AMD hw they were also penalized for it. They also had contracts with vendors that in most sane countries would be considered quite illegal.