Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 13th May 2009 09:53 UTC
Permalink for comment 363363
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-01-24
Apple want to win this so I would expect them to pursue all avenues to protect their IP and business model. It's clearly one that works for them.
OS X may be sold separately but it is explicitly intended for apple supported hardware - the two are a package that Apple has tested, optimized and will therefore provide support for and will want to protect from dilution by a 3rd party. It isn't purely off-the-shelf components stuffed into a pretty case. The custom boards, firmware and the overall integration with the OS makes up the final product. With PsyStar you take a lucky dip that all works as best as it should - like you do with Windows. The Apple product may not always be perfect as that implies but my personal experience has shown it to prove more reliable than any of the wintel boxes I've owned or supported. If Apple as it exists today are forced to allow OS X on OEM machines then we will all lose because the OEMs will cut corners and Apple won't be able to compete on price