Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 13th May 2009 09:53 UTC
Two weekends ago, Apple accused Psystar of withholding information in the ongoing lawsuit between the two companies, and the Cupertino company asked the judge to order Psystar to reveal said information. Psystar replied, explaining that some documents simply did not exist, and some were lost during a move of offices. Apparently, judge Alsup wasn't impressed with the defence, and sided with Apple.
Permalink for comment 363423
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:
2006-10-11
And this is the crux of the matter. Pystar are using a RETAIL product as though it is an OEM product because is is priced like an OEM product [...] "
Good Lord, Apple and pricing are completely contingent factors in this issue -- the crux of the matter is if a party of a contract is allowed to unilaterally change the beforehand agreed upon conditions of a contract by positing a post-agreement addendum to the contract.
The seriousness of this issue obviously stretches far beyond any single agent or product, so forget Apple and OS X and look at the issue at hand..