Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 18th May 2009 19:06 UTC
We all know them. We all hate them. They are generally overdone, completely biased, or so vague they border on the edge of pointlessness (or toppled over said edge). Yes, I'm talking about those "Is Linux ready for the desktop" articles. Still, this one is different.
Permalink for comment 364222
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2006-05-12
The main problem with your suggestion is that this could be built on top of Linux and the app store was kind of done by Lindows/Linspire.
The biggest problem I have with Linux (as a desktop) is that it is design by committee and too many people have entirely different ideas for the operating system so there is never a clear direction to move in.
You have tons of people who have their own idea of what the system should be to succeed on the desktop and most of them are wrong.
His list was decent and I have a few of my own.
people have this idea that the Linux user never has to go deeper than the UI, and this is just wrong.
When you do go to the shell to do something, and --help or 'man xxx' to see the syntax, you get a page of flags when almost every single person checking --help needs exactly the same couple of flags.
It would take a new user (ie. someone who forgot the command) several minutes to figure out "tar -xzvf file.tar.gz" with man pages or --help.
I have read thousands of Linux related documentation and I am Linux certified, but I only ever use it every several months and I have to Google simple command line tasks like extracting a compressed file because the help files are like reading an instruction manual.
I'm a grown up now. I don't have as much time to play with toys as I used to.