Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 19th May 2009 22:20 UTC
Permalink for comment 364674
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-23
Seriously though, they probably stuffed the patches in with the next OS release as they've done with proper sandboxing around safari and those other niceties that make breaking osX easy.
(It's a bit of irony to learn that Windows actually has better security mechanisms in place than osX. The security researcher's disagree with the marketing.)
I don't like to wait for them. Since Avie Tevanian left the company, they've become far too reckless in their software, as if they're doing it purposely to sell new hardware.
All the security bits in Windows would mean something if Microsoft removed ActiveX, but it's still a security leak by design and no matter how many UAC dialogues appear, you can't change people. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him think, as I say.