Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 24th May 2009 12:06 UTC
Permalink for comment 365238
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-10-15
The judge should try to find the fitting punishment for the crime. not the hardest possible or weakest according to law. If the judge is a member of a group which only tries to get harder punishments for copyright infringing.
i guess that judge will only think that the hardest punishment is fair, since he is actively trying to make the punishents harder by changing the law.
And yes the media industri is a good lobby organisation if the judges think that they have to join their organisations to get a better understanding of the issues. and if the only reasson they joined is to get a better understanding they should join some groups that discuss the opposite.
if you want to get closer to the truth you need to hear both parties