Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 5th Jun 2009 22:20 UTC
Permalink for comment 367367
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-03-26
I've -1 Trolled you because of the tone of your post and the following facts you were grossly inaccurate about:
* Linux already has 3D accelleration and network drivers (so it can already run many Windows games better than ReactOS)
* ReactOS already has ethernet network drivers - not tried wireless, but then I find even Windows to be buggy with WiFi with many cards. So I'm really not quite sure what you're on about when you mention ReactOS's lack of "network".
* Ignoring games for a moment: Given ReactOS is BASED on a *nix app (WINE), it's safe to say that Linux/BSD runs not that much less Windows apps (via WINE) than ReactOS does. So there already are workable alternatives to Windows (not that I want to discurrage this project either mind).
* and finally: Millions of people world wide already use Linux/BSD as their desktop OS (including myself). So clearly it is a viable desktop OS.
Sure, Linux/BSD maybe a different way of working to what you're used to (package managers and different software suites as opposed to randomly downloaded untrusted EXEs and running Microsoft branded bloatware), but to argue that these differences make Linux/BSD useless is pure ignorance and trolling.