Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 8th Jun 2009 18:02 UTC
Apple At the WWDC today, Apple has lifted the veil on a number of features of its upcoming operating system, Snow Leopard. Most of the work on Snow Leopard has gone into under-the-hood technologies and optimisations, but there are also a number of interface tweaks. The company also updated some of its laptops, while also lowering their prices. We got all the news from MacRumorsLive.com.
Permalink for comment 367441
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
FealDorf
Member since:
2008-01-07

You don't get it. End-users don't *care* about these new APIs; and developers need their users to have these API's. It's kinda like a chicken-egg story... Let's see how quickly users will adopt it. If you ask me; it needs a few killer-apps..

Vista was also, in a sense, a developmental upgrade -- it featured hardware-accelerated WPF, DX10, a new audio stack, a new printing system, the list goes on..
BUT it wasn't an incremental upgrade. Instead it was an unoptimized and unfinished OS which is why it failed to get a comparatively sufficient market. It's nowhere a failure like Windows ME (and Vista's still more PCs than mac). That's my take anyway..

>>I wonder what would have happened if Microsoft had just developed a stronger XP in the first place.<<
Everyone's saying Win7 is faster than XP. Why would they? If you ask me; XP is way too refined to get any gain.. Not to mention that Win7 has unanimously positive reception. It doesn't matter if it's a loser followed by a winner; people see it as the next iteration from XP. Secretly, so does MS..

IMO Win7 and Snow Leopard are quite alike -- "commercial service packs". The difference is that you have to pay the premium for one of them.
Win7 is Vista + UI and polish
Snow Leopard is Leopard + APIs and tidbits

I have a Mac-Mini with Leopard; and I'm not opting for the upgrade. Don't get me wrong; I love my Mac but I use windows as well. Arguing that Snow Leopard's worth looking for a technological upgrade would work just as well for Vista SP1..

Reply Parent Score: 1