Linked by RandomGuy on Wed 10th Jun 2009 20:00 UTC
General Development This series is aimed at programming language aficionados. There's a lot of very abstract writing about programming languages and a lot of simple minded "language X sux!" style blog posts by people who know next to nothing about programming. What I feel is sorely missing is a kind of article that deliberately sacrifices the last 10% of precision that make the theoretical articles dry and long winded but still makes a point and discusses the various trade offs involved. This series is meant to fill that void and hopefully start a lot of discussions that are more enlightening than the articles themselves. I will point out some parallels in different parts of computing that I haven't seen mentioned as well as analyze some well known rules of thumb and link to interesting blogs and articles.
Permalink for comment 367835
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
arbour42
Member since:
2005-07-06

you wrote: "Now as for making static languages more dynamic: I think adding optional static typing to dynamic languages is a better approach IF - and this is critical - IF you have coding guidelines in place and enforced. That's the short answer, the long one is in an article a few weeks down the road."

So just like Perl 6 is doing now, adding optional static typing. I think the Parrot open-source "Common Language Runtime" and Perl 6 will be huge in about 2-3 years time. I'd be interested in that article.

I'll check out "growing a language." You have a good idea for the article, but just need to tighten it up a bit - it tended to meander. Sorry to be critical, but i double-majored in Poetry, and can be a bit anal sometime :-)

Reply Parent Score: 1