Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 10th Jun 2009 22:44 UTC
Permalink for comment 367981
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-05
Like Thom, says, Apple hasn't released details about a possible Snow Leopard full version. Perhaps Apple was waiting to see what Microsoft would do.
It's also worth keeping in mind, while doing these costs comparisons that Apple has a smaller demographic than Microsoft does and there OS is still locked into their Apple Hardware. So for me, it makes perfect sense for Apple to charge more than Microsoft. Like another commentor pointed out, for Microsoft, the low cost is probably more circumstantial than pure unadulterated charity.