Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 11th Jun 2009 23:12 UTC, submitted by Bahadir
Permalink for comment 368130
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-05-19
I agree with you. First of all we don't use anything ugly and old. I hate them.
For example we don't have Makefiles. We use SCons (new).
We don't have ugly shell scripts. We use Python.
We don't have ugly x86 assembly, although assembly is in itself hard to read, please take a look at Codezero vectors.S you will see how well documented it is.
Codezero *is* indeed, a candidate for you to design your own environment and OS. The L4 API gives you the least common denominator mechanism to build different systems on top. The POSIX services are just an example.
What's better, is each of them may co-exist and interact on the same system.
The Codezero project started with the very same limitations I see in the existing systems that you have mentioned.