Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 12th Jun 2009 13:55 UTC
Permalink for comment 368192
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-04-05
"This is a direct result from Firefox' popularity, and instead of trying to get a free ride on Firefox' success, maybe Opera should try to build and market a product people want."
I don't necessarily agree with what Opera is demanding. Although if you take away the addon/plugin feature from Firefox I would probably prefer to use IE over Firefox, since both are about similar in slowness and I don't have to go download another browser. I think Firefox lags behind Opera in certain features. So for Opera to develop a product that people want would be to get rid of all their features and make a slow and bland browser instead. The problem with Opera is that it is too customizable which makes it confusing for the average users.
Edited 2009-06-12 16:42 UTC