Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 12th Jun 2009 18:25 UTC
Permalink for comment 368352
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
This is what I believe:
1) There are other things in linux ecosystem that are derived from patent incumbered things.
2) But none of those comes from company that is so openly against Free & Open Source Software.
But I have no ill feelings towards Mono developers and users. Just like I have no ill feelings towards WINE developers and users.
I only request that Mono is treated like WINE where:
1) it is _NOT_ installed by _DEFAULT_
2) important package/metapackage, such as ubuntu-desktop metapackage, does not depend on it
3) still give option to people to use it by including it in multiverse/non-free
So far I am quite happy with Ubuntu because it lets me uninstall f-spot, tomboy and mono without removing other non-mono stuff (ubuntu-desktop)
Am I being unreasonable?