Novell could have negotiated a patent peace concerning Mono between the whole of the community and Microsoft, instead they chose to just protect themselves.
They could have but it makes no business sense to protect competing companies. We have to remember that we're talking about companies out to make a profit. Trusting them to protect anyone's interest but their own is naive.
And having all free Linux distros depending on Mono would allow Microsoft to FUD them.
How so? I think Mono only lends more credibility to .NET.
Trying to keep Mono out of your core dependencies makes sense, because in the world of "big company vs. small company" lawsuits, having to enter the struggle usually is a defeat for the small company.
If we always thought like that we would have ceded the entire software market to Microsoft a long time ago.
Member since:
2005-07-07
They could have but it makes no business sense to protect competing companies. We have to remember that we're talking about companies out to make a profit. Trusting them to protect anyone's interest but their own is naive.
How so? I think Mono only lends more credibility to .NET.
If we always thought like that we would have ceded the entire software market to Microsoft a long time ago.