Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 17th Jun 2009 22:36 UTC
Permalink for comment 369108
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-18
If you're going to seperate them into 'good' 'better' 'best', why not bronze/silver/gold?
That's not a bad idea. But you still have the confusing situation that they keep older stock in the distribution channel, and varying clock speeds at the different levels.
So is the gold I'm looking at older than the silver? Is the silver better for me in that instance? Should I buy a faster bronze, or a slower silver? Which has better energy efficiency / lower cooling requirements?
You might as well just have performance ratings for complete PCs, and just use the code names for the part sales - because that's what the respective markets are most likely to understand.