Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 17th Jun 2009 22:36 UTC
Permalink for comment 369141
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-06
Are these guys kidding? After all the fiascos surrounding Intel with the lack of open specs regarding processor optimizations (only Icc can utilize 90%+ of an Intel's processor capabilities - the rest are sitting at a mere 30% at best), the corruption of OEMs to lock out AMD, the moronic changes in MB-sockets every 6 months, the circus of even more moronic processor bugs, stupid design decisions and eratas and most of all the repugnant CISC architecture which sits in the pantheon of dead-horses that are getting flogged back to life just to haunt the computing industry one year after the other ... Are all these supposed to be written off the history record with a ... name change? You can fool some ppl sometimes but you cant fool all the people all the times.