Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 20th Jun 2009 15:57 UTC
Permalink for comment 369526
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-09-15
Actually the ICANN have been doing fine exception on some sensitive issues in the US. Just think about the XXX domain name. I think requiring by law that all domains hosting adult content having to be registred by this domain name extension is logical. But both the sex industries and those stupid right-wing religious lobbists opposed the move, one saying the opposite of other. Having the ICANN not overseen by the (puritanical) US government would lead to some great improvement and would at the same time garantee (to some degree) freedom of the net.