Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 23rd Jun 2009 21:40 UTC
Graphics, User Interfaces The Engineering 7 weblog has an item about the improvements made in the ClearType font rendering technology which has been included in Windows since Windows XP. While I won't go too deeply into that post, I did figure it was a good opportunity to talk about font antialiasing in general; which type do you prefer?
Permalink for comment 369965
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Shape accuracy with provisions
by bousozoku on Wed 24th Jun 2009 00:16 UTC
Member since:

Having seen a lot of odd renderings of typefaces, I want shape accuracy first. The problem is that a lot of people designing for the display vs. the printed page, don't choose typefaces that are appropriate and have the inbuilt quality necessary to be displayed well on a low resolution device.

I don't find that most cheap font files are created nicely enough to look good in every situation or that displays (cheap or expensive) are capable of clearly displaying text. It's a matter of giving the renderer plenty of information, not allowing it to make guesses at what the typeface designer wanted.

Reply Score: 2