Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 23rd Jun 2009 21:40 UTC
Graphics, User Interfaces The Engineering 7 weblog has an item about the improvements made in the ClearType font rendering technology which has been included in Windows since Windows XP. While I won't go too deeply into that post, I did figure it was a good opportunity to talk about font antialiasing in general; which type do you prefer?
Permalink for comment 370131
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

I find Windows less readable. There's so much edge vibrance, it hurst my eyes after a while. I don't know why people keep saying it's better for screen, it simply isn't.

What PPI is your screen? I find AA distracting on 19" 1280×1024 monitors with their big, fat pixels. I also find the jaggies of non-AA fonts at this size distracting though. I prefer WUXGA or UXGA in 15" panel sizes which makes working with sub-pixel elements a lot more effective. What panel do you use primarily ? Also, what brightness do you run your screen at? Adobe RGB specifies 160 cd/m2 and SRGB 80 cd/m2 which are both way below the extreme default brightness levels found in many of today's monitors.

Reply Parent Score: 1