Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 24th Jun 2009 14:10 UTC, submitted by TuxJournal.net
Window Managers We're all pretty much versed in the worlds of GNOME, KDE, and to a lesser degree, Xfce, and while there are lots of alternatives, none of the smaller ones really seem to gain much traction beyond their fans. An exception is LXDE, a small and resource efficient desktop environment.
Permalink for comment 370132
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: Comment by flynn
by Doc Pain on Wed 24th Jun 2009 23:08 UTC in reply to "RE[6]: Comment by flynn"
Doc Pain
Member since:
2006-10-08

For example there are many excellent Ruby on Rails developers who have never written a line of C and don't know how to do manual memory management, but they do write great web applications.


Again, I don't think it depends on the programming language, but on how well you can master it. You can write crap programs in C as well as in RoR, and you can write great web applications in C as well as in RoR. (I like RoR, by the way, and will practice it.)

Yes I'm not surprised that FreeBSD boots faster. FreeBSD is very much a server-oriented and "conservative" operating system.


I may politely disagree. FreeBSD is a multi-purpose operating system. It can be used on servers (its main field of use), on desktops and on "mixed forms". I'm using it exclusively on the desktop since 4.0.

It expects the end user to configure a lot of things manually. Desktop Linux distributions on the other hand try to set up as many things for you as possible.


This kind of preconfiguration does exist on FreeBSD, too, but it covers the OS only. Installed applications are a different thing.

There are projects like PC-BSD and DesktopBSD that bring preconfiguration and preinstalled applications to BSD. I think they're comparable to modern Linusi.

I wouldn't use FreeBSD as a desktop because it takes too much time to get the graphical environment right, [...]


Definitely not. It just depends on what exactly you want to have. Installing Gnome, for example, just requires one pkg_add command (to install it and all the dependencies) and one change in the ttys file to launch gdm. Everything is excellently documented - a strength of FreeBSD. The same goes for KDE, WindowMaker and XFCE and all the others.

[...] whereas on Linux the graphical environment usually works out of the box, assuming that your hardware is supported.


That's right. I found Linux to detect and setup the graphical subsystem better and quicker than X.org included in FreeBSD. Furthermore, Linux supports more different hardware. I noticed problems with X.org since FreeBSD doesn't carry XFree86 anymore (which I had no problem with).

Reply Parent Score: 2