Linked by Kroc Camen on Mon 22nd Jun 2009 12:16 UTC
OSNews, Generic OSes Software moves on at a break-neck pace these days--version numbers clock up ever quicker as vendors try to market their apps as the latest and greatest. Software generally ages badly, falling into a state of looking grossly out of date, lacking new functionality that we've come to depend upon as well as compatibility problems. Dear OSNews readers, what old software (5+ years) do you still use, why, and what problems do you come across in sticking with it? Read More for my own contribution to the list
Permalink for comment 370468
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
More then I probably should
by neozeed on Fri 26th Jun 2009 13:50 UTC
Member since:

I paid a small fortune for WORD 2.0 back in the day, and yeah I still use it. Screw all the 'progress' Word 2 is what most people use as far as core functionality.

Oh and as I mentioned somewhere else, QuickC for windows. The debugger doesn't work right but it's got great C documentation, and is great for me to bang out small stuff, test blocks of code etc.. And it's on 4 floppies!

I also still run my NeXT cube with nextstep, but I mostly use it to IRC, and testing crap for endianess & whatnot. Oh sure there is faster stuff, but if it runs "ok" on a 25Mhz 68040 it can't be that bad.

And for 'fun' I do run 4.3 BSD on SIMH's VAX 11/780 emulator...

I also LOVE Watcom 10 & 11's stack unwinding, to watch things crash out... Not to mention for building MS-DOS & Win32s exe's that'll run on dammed near everything.

Heck even Windows 7 will still run Win32s bound exe's, just no MS-DOS stuff without something like VirtualPC/DOSBox.

I've just got to figure out why the old Exchange 4 MS-DOS client won't talk to the Exchange 2003 server.. It was faster then any windows client, and ran great in a VM...

Reply Score: 1