Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 2nd Jul 2009 12:19 UTC
KDE Whenever I use KDE, the part I dislike the most is the rendering engine used by Konqueror, called KHTML. KHTML just doesn't render pages as smooth and as well as Gecko and the KHTML fork WebKit, up to a point where I find Konqueror unusable as a web browser. However, work is underway to replace KHTML in Konqueror with WebKit, but according to KDE developer Adam Treat, this is a futile effort: Konqueror is too KHTML API specific.
Permalink for comment 371363
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Other views
by nifgraup on Thu 2nd Jul 2009 19:05 UTC in reply to "RE: Other views"
nifgraup
Member since:
2009-01-13

I have to agree with some comments that the KHTML devs are actually hurting KDE as a whole.

Complex web apps will never work in KHTML and giving people the illusion that that might change is bad. KHTML is a dead end.


You can't blame KDE for trying to build a full desktop environment with a web browser and everything, but you can blame the distributions, they pick the defaults for users.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2