Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 2nd Jul 2009 12:19 UTC
Permalink for comment 371368
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-08-03
The comment that Konqueror is too dependent on KHTML has been called into question:
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-devel&m=124654914508070&w=2
(for everyone who doesn't follow KDE development: David is usually bang-on when it comes to technical matters, and I'm inclined to trust him on this).
I wouldn't be at all surprised to see that some of the web-specific plugins (the DOM-viewer in particular) being KHTML-specific, though.