Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 2nd Jul 2009 20:54 UTC, submitted by Adurbe
Permalink for comment 371432
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2008-03-08
Why?
I think this case is important - it's not like they are cutting Apple out of the loop as the OS is actually bought.
I think this is a good way to see how legally binding EULA's really are. I would hope that they are not binding at all - Just imagine Ford telling you that after you bought its cars you could only drive it on Sundays on lanes that it has certified safe for the car.
Ofcourse, Apple should not have to provide (hardware) support if its terms are breached, but that is a different thing.