Star Why Do We Claim Mac OS X Is Subsidised at Retail?
Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 3rd Jul 2009 11:27 UTC
Mac OS X Whenever we talk about Mac clone makers such as Psystar, we all more or less accept as a fact that Apple is selling copies of its Mac OS X operating system at a price lower than it would have been if Apple did not have a hardware business. Even though we treat this statement as fact - recently, I've been wondering: where is the proof?
E-mail Print r 0   · Read More · 85 Comment(s) http://osne.ws/gsr
Permalink for comment 371573
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: no way OSX is subsidised.
by jptros on Fri 3rd Jul 2009 15:04 UTC in reply to "RE: no way OSX is subsidised. "
jptros
Member since:
2005-08-26

If you're going to talk about leeches; name a single substantial thing Red Hat has done to advance Linux forward to the desktop besides regurgitating the same crap over and over again.


Since when was advancing linux on short of an enterprise workstation or server something redhat had any reason to "innovate" by your assumed standards?

Oh did you think redhat was competing with apple for shiny gadget market share that people like you can glance over and see their reflections on while typing on a forum trying to justify apple's cause?

Haha. No really, hahahaha.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1