Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 3rd Jul 2009 11:27 UTC
Whenever we talk about Mac clone makers such as Psystar, we all more or less accept as a fact that Apple is selling copies of its Mac OS X operating system at a price lower than it would have been if Apple did not have a hardware business. Even though we treat this statement as fact - recently, I've been wondering: where is the proof?
Permalink for comment 371590
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:
2005-07-06
I know that it is hypothetically possible but Dell might end up turning around and saying, "well, hang on, who is running this company?" and just flag it.
Don't get me wrong though, my vision of Apple is as a purely software company - and this vision would be based upon the idea of Apple purchasing Adobe, focusing on expanding their middleware, then possibly gradually rolling back their hardware division with the focus is on strictly controlled contractual arrangements with big name vendors that allow them enough room to differentiate but not too much as to cause incompatibilities (for example, a standard motherboard with the differentiating factor is a bigger hard disk, faster processor, more memory or a better graphics card).
I too would love to be able to walk into a shop, purchase a Lenovo Thinkpad, run Mac OS X and have it fully supported by Lenovo but I don't see it happening anytime soon - thats the sad reality unfortunately.