Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 6th Jul 2009 15:43 UTC
Permalink for comment 371917
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 11:39 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 11:32 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 19:39 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-12-26
1) Add new stack with compatibility for the old
2) Start deprecating the old stack
3) Remove the old stack and be completely on the new
They have very little reason to throw away the "Gnome" stack, because it's pretty much the standard Linux stack these days. Having it around allows them to leverage the work of others, and contribute back to Linux.
Also, a lot of that stack is just a bunch of daemons. It's not like you have to be married to Gnome to benefit from it. They "just work" in the background.
Ironically, even if dbus is often (misguidedly) pushed as "Gnome" technology, it's Qt that has the world-class dbus bindings (QtDbus). This is good, considering that dbus is at the heart of what is happening in Linux userspace these days.