Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 6th Jul 2009 15:43 UTC
Permalink for comment 371942
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-24
I think the primary motivation is to dump the requirement for an X Server on these devices.
GTK+ just isn't supported well on anything but X11, while Qt will render into a raw framebuffer quite happily. This means faster startup, lower memory footprint, a way more cohesive 'application management' environment and no need for separate-process window managers etc.
Providing proprietary accelerated rendering support for specific QT Widgets is also going to be much easier when there is no X Server between Qt and the hardware, which may be something Nokia wants to implement.