Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 7th Jul 2009 08:51 UTC, submitted by PLan
Permalink for comment 372113
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-02-19
We're not "back to square one" at all. As I understand it, Mono is being used to develop GTK applications, mainly targeting the Gnome desktop; potentially providing compatibility with .net applications targeting Windows is a side-benefit, not the main goal. The "sexy windows bits" can be removed completely -- and apparently will be, in one of the distributions -- and Mono will still be able to perform its primary intended function (of enabling GTK/Gnome development) perfectly.