Linked by Jordan Spencer Cunningham on Wed 8th Jul 2009 18:34 UTC, submitted by rlem6983
Google's recent move of revealing the Chrome OS to a suspecting public has put a great many people on alert. Some say it's a major privacy issue, some say Google oughtn't to become more and more monopolistic, while others think that the wide array of popular Linux distributions shouldn't become even more fragmented than it already is. "Google's decision to create its own Linux distribution and splinter the Linux community decisively once again can only be seen as foolhardy and self-obsessive.
Instead of treading its own path, Google should have sought to leverage the stellar work already carried out by Mark Shuttleworth and his band of merry coders and tied its horse to the Ubuntu cart."
Permalink for comment 372330
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2008-04-18
So this guy is saying that Google shouldn't create yet another Linux distro but help Ubuntu get more market share because there is too much fragmentation in Linux already.
A few years ago, before Ubuntu even existed, Mandriva was by far the most popular Linux desktop. Applying the author's logic a few years back, Shuttleworth should have never created Ubuntu. Instead, he should've used his financial power to help Mandriva become more popular.
Why exactly Ubuntu? Because Shuttleworth spends more money on advertising? That doesn't make Ubuntu a better Linux distro, it makes it just more popular. So I'd rather see a better Linux distro become THE Linux.