Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 9th Jul 2009 12:09 UTC
Permalink for comment 372554
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-07-09
> Lets cover some really obvious points here.
Ok, let's go.
> If RMS had defined the group as "_men_ who had never used EMACS" no one would have batted an eyelid.
True, in a room full of men that is. Would he dare make such a comment in front of a room with mostly women?...Probably not. What if instead of _men_ he had said Asians? Probably wouldn't bother the white men...but what about the Asian men? I know they'd be insulted.
> [...]which would have been equally stupid if he had referred to a male, so the use of the word "women" is utterly inconsequential.
No, it isn't at all. He wasn't being funny (because it is a stupid joke...I think we can all agree). He was being derogatory, that's the subtext of the joke...without the implication that women aren't good with technology, there is no joke.