Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 9th Jul 2009 12:09 UTC
Permalink for comment 372592
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-10-02
...intend for his joke to be received that way.
From RMS's reply (notice: I've put the important part in bold)
----
The cult of the Virgin of Emacs is simply intended as a joke about the cult of the Virgin Mary. I assure anyone who perceived derogatory meanings in it that I did not intend them.
----
RMS has already given a reasonable answer and an implied apology. It is related to RMS being highly critical of religions. Unfortunately somebody didn´t understand the context and they attacked (and keep attacking) from their non-understanding position.
Now. We need an implied apology from "Lefty" and Thom (Holwerda), both having grossly misrepresented the position of RMS.
Thom -> your "journalism" is quite lacking, I'm afraid.
To all -> I can easily see why people are offended, and I agree the joke was tasteless. But come on, grow a spine!
--Kristian Poul Herkild
*** Besides that, I believe patents should be abolished ***