Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 9th Jul 2009 12:09 UTC
Permalink for comment 372690
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-04-10
I'm a human not a huperson. "Mankind" is a set that includes women, and if there were women in the army back then, the grand old Duke of York would still have and ten thousand men. I find "man" to be gender neutral enough in most circumstances, and the male pronoun "he" should do for a neutral one. Obviously wouldn't say "he" when you're specifically talking about a woman, but it's good enough for talking about some hypothetical person.