Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 27th Sep 2005 22:34 UTC
Permalink for comment 37313
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-05
I agree with you for the most part. I think XML has a place, but its place is very small.
Probably 95% of the projects I've been forced to use XML on could have been done much more efficiently some other way.
The problem is that people making decisions often make them based on market hype. To give an example, when I worked at Novell, one of the managers went to an XML conference and came back and informed the team that we were going to do all future development in XML. He asked one guy to research and find the best XML IDE out there.
This is extreme, but I think a lot of project suffer from XML due to this same level of insight.