Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 16th Jul 2009 21:44 UTC
Permalink for comment 373841
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-07-17
Close, but no cigar. A major problem is not patterns in the code, but rather function addresses. If you add even one byte to the beginning of a file, all addresses beyond that point are now shifted by one byte. Think of all the functions statically linked which are called by address. Every single call now has a new address. That's a lot of cruft to send over a wire. If you replace function addresses with function symbols, most of them are not going to change. Less info to send that way.