Linked by Jordan Spencer Cunningham on Mon 20th Jul 2009 18:05 UTC
Permalink for comment 374422
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-11-20
My answer is that you seem to take it way too religious.
Yes, these patches directly benefit existing customers of Microsoft, in the way that they don't have to install Linux on their physical hardware to run it well. But I guess they are therefore more likely to try (and keep) it.
Really, one more Linux machine running is one more Linux machine running, be it on real hardware or inside a virtualized environment. If it runs nice with both, so much the better.