Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 20th Jul 2009 19:16 UTC
Permalink for comment 374446
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-07-21
I disagree with your suggestion that the average user doesn't care about ZFS. That might be true for the awareness of what their filesystem is actually called (just like ext3, btrfs, ...), but they're definitely aware of the features it provides. Being able to take regular snapshots of their data is *incredibly* useful - if you don't think so, you've obviously not accidently lost some data. At some point in the future we'll also be able to provide encryption support at the file system level.