Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 23rd Jul 2009 09:43 UTC
Permalink for comment 374838
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
The question I would love answered is whether Microsoft would have voluntarily handed over the code by their own free will? I find it interesting that Microsoft so interested in 'protecting' their 'intellectual property' but when it comes to other peoples they're pretty loose with making sure they comply.
Edit: Funny enough it actually reminds me of the tax department how if you owe them money they'll jump all over your back but when they owe you a refund the processes seem to take longer.
Edited 2009-07-23 12:59 UTC