Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 28th Jul 2009 22:21 UTC
Permalink for comment 375962
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-05-11
None of the cases you raised was really render EULA illegal. In all cases there was other more decisive factor to let judges made decision. For example, in Adobe's case, the EULA's legality is not the decisive reason, the reason is the EULA is not applied because the software was not installed.
And no contract is agreed by reading. It is agreed by something made independently after reading and understanding. OK, my EULA may be something you need pay me by replying this. Just kidding.