Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 3rd Aug 2009 08:47 UTC, submitted by anonymous
Permalink for comment 376774
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-04-12
As an electrical technician i find this horrible. There are organizations out there such as UL that do extensive testing of consumer devices. IDK if the iPod touch is UL (or an equivalent outside safety organization) listed but i would hope so. Knowing apple though it wouldn't surprise me if all testing is done in house.
This sounds like an internal short and such explosive results can be alleviated if a simple tear away vent were placed on the battery. The battery would vent its contents and fail to work afterward but would not critically fail due to pressure. Not having a safety device as simple as this is irresponsible at best even if space concerns were an issue.
Edited 2009-08-03 17:56 UTC