Linked by Jordan Spencer Cunningham on Tue 11th Aug 2009 00:47 UTC
Permalink for comment 378073
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-06
I use arch on my few core machines (netbook, laptop, older dual core machines) and gentoo on my 8 core dev boxes. I ran into gentoo first and consequently was never comfortable with debian based distros.
Arch seems to sit somewhere in between. I really appreciate the choices they made for systems configuration, it's very simple and straightforward.
I have run into problems where an upgrade set has left a machine inoperable (once due to me shutting the lid on a laptop during upgrade, another due to a bad readline package install). Both machines were recoverable by booting from an arch distro, but it does indicate to me that arch isn't a 100% distro yet.