Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 15th Aug 2009 17:55 UTC
Permalink for comment 378977
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-08-10
It was the first release of a completely new operating system, of course it was unstable and buggy as heck.
I think that "marginally more stable than win95 sr3" is a slight exageration. I remember using NT 3.51 and Visual C++ (amongst other apps) solidly for about 2 years and it proved very stable for me.
Sure, it had some bugs and it had its moments like any other operating system but IMHO it was a very stable platform to work on and certainly a lot more stable than Windows 95.
I remember wanting the Windows 95 interface but with the stability of NT 3.51 - then came along NT 4.0