Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 15th Aug 2009 17:55 UTC
Over the past couple of months, and especially over the past couple of weeks, I've been working very hard to write and complete my thesis. I performed all the work on Windows 7, but now that the thesis is finally done, submitted, and accepted, I installed Ubuntu - and immediately I was reminded of why I do not do any serious work on Linux: the train wreck that is X.org.
Permalink for comment 378989
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I don't see a single argument why is X to blame. X is just a single layer in UNIXish graphics software. There are quite a few layers above it if one uses something like Gnome or KDE. Even plain X applications are often linked with "Gnome support" or "KDE support", although they don't need that to work, but some people like to have everything "integrated".
I tried both, Gnome and KDE and never managed them to work satisfactory, so I've given them up. I preferred KDE, but it used to crash, at least, once a day.
I must admit that I've compiled some of the X applications myself (like Xine), and I used a lot of
"--disable-this" and "--disable-that" switches while running configure. That means that I have drastically reduced a number of dependencies which are enabled by default.
Anyway, I don't have crashes on my machine, and have no problems watching DVD movies (encrypted too), Windows Media files, FLV files, etc.
So, I don't think that all the problems are in X layer.
In fact, in world of Linux, it is that it is not easy to pick a good application among couple of alternatives. Majority of desktop software doesn't bring any serious income to its authors, so bad software, or bad packaging of good a good software is not causing anyone to go bankrupt or something. Good software may coexist with bad software forever. The only way is test everything and find out what works.
Member since:
2006-12-07
I don't see a single argument why is X to blame. X is just a single layer in UNIXish graphics software. There are quite a few layers above it if one uses something like Gnome or KDE. Even plain X applications are often linked with "Gnome support" or "KDE support", although they don't need that to work, but some people like to have everything "integrated".
I tried both, Gnome and KDE and never managed them to work satisfactory, so I've given them up. I preferred KDE, but it used to crash, at least, once a day.
I must admit that I've compiled some of the X applications myself (like Xine), and I used a lot of
"--disable-this" and "--disable-that" switches while running configure. That means that I have drastically reduced a number of dependencies which are enabled by default.
Anyway, I don't have crashes on my machine, and have no problems watching DVD movies (encrypted too), Windows Media files, FLV files, etc.
So, I don't think that all the problems are in X layer.
In fact, in world of Linux, it is that it is not easy to pick a good application among couple of alternatives. Majority of desktop software doesn't bring any serious income to its authors, so bad software, or bad packaging of good a good software is not causing anyone to go bankrupt or something. Good software may coexist with bad software forever. The only way is test everything and find out what works.