Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 15th Aug 2009 00:04 UTC
Permalink for comment 379079
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-03-26
Same here... I wish Opera was more laxist and displayed most sites correctly. Currently, it simply doesn't.
But it does display most sites corrently.
It's been one of the most standards complient browsers for a long time.
In fact, Opera 10 even scores 100% on the Acid3 test.
So I'm a little confused how you came to your conclusion (I don't mean to sound rude, but are you comparing Opera to IE and surfing sites predominantly hacked to run in IE?)
That really depends on which figures you read as each website's webstat will have a different bias depending on it's clientele.
While some sites listed here ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_web_browsers#Historical... ) rank Opera between 0.5% to 3%, there are Easten European and Russian sites that see Opera as high as 30% ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opera_(web_browser)#Market_adoption )
Plus you have to take into account the technology competence of the sites user base (eg, a site like OSNews is going to have more webstats in favour of alternative browsers compared to a site like microsoft's bing.com)
So in short, browser market shares is nothing more than a best guess, and best not taken too seriously.
[edit - tidied up my point a little]
Edited 2009-08-17 20:50 UTC