Linked by David Adams on Mon 24th Aug 2009 09:21 UTC
Linux A reader asks: Why is Linux still not as user friendly as the two other main OSes with all the people developing for Linux? Is it because it is mainly developed by geeks? My initial feeling when reading this question was that it was kind of a throwaway, kind of a slam in disguise as a genuine question. But the more I thought about it, the more intrigued I felt. There truly are a large amount of resources being dedicated to the development of Linux and its operating system halo (DEs, drivers, apps, etc). Some of these resources are from large companies (IBM, Red Hat, Novell). Why isn't Linux more user-friendly? Is this an inherent limitation with open source software?
Permalink for comment 380250
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Is Linux un-user friendly?
by rockwell on Mon 24th Aug 2009 13:34 UTC in reply to "Is Linux un-user friendly?"
Member since:

So, to summarize:

You make your wife use three laptops, when one powerful laptop running Windows 7 RC1 would do everything she needs.

Gotta love waste.

Reply Parent Score: -5